One important thing to consider about our group is that we do have some views that may oppose those of the “modern or western” world. This however is not exactly the case. In fact the only reason this might appear the case is because of perhaps of the axiom we occasionally subscribe to, “If something appears to be broken, or if there is something happening that you disagree with, do not complain, but work towards solving the problem”. The idea is to become active in attaining a solution.
In practice this means learning about many differing sets of skills and becoming used to the idea that sometimes what appears to be an easy quick fix (such as using a power drill or purchasing all of ones food) is actually a short cut that will lead to just more problems down the road. For example, food is an essential for any human and completely needed for survival. For much of the world food is actually quite sparse at least in terms of what modern agriculture provides to these people. Agriculture however has propped up populations in these areas far beyond what is should be. In some cases perhaps modern agriculture is the only reason people can survive in certain areas at all. This problem tends to compound upon itself very easily, as I will show. First and foremost, having abundant food will lead to population growth at least in the short term( as small as one generation). This will then extend population beyond which could have been provided if the land was just hunted and gathered upon, small scale subsistence farmed, or even types of nomadic pastoralism. Then if these people have began a certain type of food gathering method, it may limit the knowledge of other methods from the society. For example if food being supplied to these people in the form of food being delivered and sold in local markets, they are then more dependent on not merely the food being delivered but all the problems associated in maintainable such a system. Thus compounding potential problems. This coupled with the inability or at least limited capacity to get the food from the land and the larger population created by the food network can lead to potential devastating consequences. This does not have to follow such a slippery doomsayer sort of lay out but it is just used to illustrate the point that interdependent networks that require a knowledge, skill, and resource base that is not possessed by those who require the effects of the network can be limited by changes in this network. Thereby, it become more difficult for individuals to act as they are limited by agents who seek control to maintain the delicate balance that has been struck. The Earth does hold abundant resources however and the human capacity for learning and adapting is quite high so fortunately we are able to subsist.
The Ryup aim however is to have a society that is based off of as few of these tenuous networks as possible. One that is hyper adaptable, sustainable and maintains its own skill and knowledge base. This sometimes seems to conflict with the goals of other groups, however it is not pertinent to object to or even actively fight these groups, what is important is developing the skills,the knowledge, and the resources to a live within these limits even if they are self imposed to attempt to maximize sustainability, adaptability, and ultimately survivability. If you are interested in more of this sort of thinking perhaps you could read Garett Hardin’s Living Within Limits or contribute to this blog or our upcoming wiki site which will include skill manuals and other related information.
- Eating on an interconnected planet (environmentalresearchweb.org)
- Biologist Paul Ehrlich speaks about collapse (damnthematrix.wordpress.com)
- Blog 3 – Subsistence (nvpate05.wordpress.com)
- The Ramifications of the Agricultural Revolution (agrarianavarice.wordpress.com)